Preparing Your Students for Teamwork -
 
Setting the Climate for Cooperative Learning
While many students are enthused about the opportunity to learn with and from their peers, it is not uncommon to encounter students who are reluctant to participate in any sort of group activities. This reluctance could be due to a preference for working independently or due to prior bad experiences with poorly designed group projects. Providing students with a positive experience with and explicit information about active/cooperative learning (A/CL) right away helps to overcome reluctance and start the class with clear expectations.

We set the tone for our classes in the first few minutes on the first day. So, rather than simply telling students that cooperation makes learning more enjoyable or more efficient, it’s better to demonstrate it. Begin your class by putting students into pairs or teams and having them participate in a simple, well-structured cooperative activity. The activity could introduce your course, cooperative learning, or your content. You might also point out how this type of learning will build the skills they will need for success in industry, business, or academia.

Then, give your students information in your syllabus about what teamwork will mean to them in terms of attendance, participation in class, team meeting time outside of class, and especially, grading. Let students know about your policies on group and individual grades. Also, help them to understand that, when you do choose to use group grades, the assignments will be carefully structured: you will help them acquire the skills they need to work together successfully, and you will have ways of monitoring for individual accountability. Finally, acknowledge that some people would prefer to work alone and point out the activities and assignments they’ll be working on independently.

While all of our faculty and experts agreed on giving students clear information on course policies regarding A/CL, their approaches for introducing it to students varied. Look below to see some of the considerations that influenced their approaches.

Experts

  Darwyn Linder
        Professor and Chair, Department of Psychology
        Arizona State University

        Karl Smith

        Professor of Civil Engineering
        Institute of Technology, University of Minnesota

  Richard Felder
        Hoechst Celanese Professor Emeritus, Department of Chemical Engineering
        North Carolina State University

Faculty

  Ron Roedel
        Professor of Electrical Engineering
        Arizona State University

  Susan Urban
        Professor of Computer Science and Engineering
        Arizona State University

  P.K. Imbrie
        Assistant Professor of Engineering, Department of Freshman Engineering
        Purdue University

  Cesar Malave
        Associate Professor of Industrial Engineering
        Texas A&M University

  Jim Morgan
        Associate Professor of Civil Engineering
        Texas A&M University

 

 

 

 

Home | Site Map | Settings | Contact Us | © 2002, Arizona Board of Regents. All Rights Reserved.